Wilson v. State, Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wilson v. State, Unemployment Appeals Commission

969 So. 2d 1157, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18555, 2007 WL 4126526

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 21, 2007

DocketNo. 4D07-1060

StatusPublished

This text of 969 So. 2d 1157 (Wilson v. State, Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. State, Unemployment Appeals Commission, 969 So. 2d 1157, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18555, 2007 WL 4126526 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Shirley A. Wilson appeals the Unemployment Appeals Commission’s af-firmance of the referee’s findings of fact in her unemployment case determining she was ineligible for unemployment benefits. “On appeal, the Commission’s order is entitled to a presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error.” Leedham v. State Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 950 So.2d 475, 476 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). “A denial of benefits is warranted when the employee’s actions are in willful or wanton disregard of the employer’s interest as is found in deliberate violation of a standard of behavior which the employer has the right to expect of his or her employee.” Id. at 477.

We affirm.

POLEN, KLEIN and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Shirley A. Wilson appeals the Unemployment Appeals Commission’s af-firmance of the referee’s findings of fact in her unemployment case determining she was ineligible for unemployment benefits. “On appeal, the Commission’s order is entitled to a presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error.” Leedham v. State Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 950 So.2d 475, 476 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). “A denial of benefits is warranted when the employee’s actions are in willful or wanton disregard of the employer’s interest as is found in deliberate violation of a standard of behavior which the employer has the right to expect of his or her employee.” Id. at 477.

We affirm.

POLEN, KLEIN and MAY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

969 So. 2d 1157, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18555, 2007 WL 4126526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-state-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack