Wilson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Wilson v. State

275 S.W. 1118, 101 Tex. Crim. 470

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 Tex. Crim. 348 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 24, 1925·No. No. 9352.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Smith County of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts. The indictment charges the offense in correct form, and the charge of the court is correct in a case of a plea of guilty such as appears in this record.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Smith County of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts. The indictment charges the offense in correct form, and the charge of the court is correct in a case of a plea of guilty such as appears in this record.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Wilson v. State, 275 S.W. 1118, 101 Tex. Crim. 470 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

275 S.W. 1118 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.