Wilson v. State
This text of 170 S.W. 149 (Wilson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appellant was convicted of highway robbery and his punishment assessed at death.
The record before us contains neither a statement of facts nor any bills of exception. The only ground in the motion for new trial reads as follows: “Because the verdict of the jury is contrary to the evidence.” Without a statement of facts it is impossible for us to review this ground. As the death penalty was assessed, we regret that the record' comes to us in this condition, but as it does we can only affirm the judgment.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 S.W. 149, 75 Tex. Crim. 62, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-state-texcrimapp-1914.