Wilson v. State

134 S.W. 704, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 645
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 8, 1911·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, P. J.

Thisi conviction was for burglary.

TRe record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The only ground of the motion for new trial is the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. In the absence of the statement of facts, this matter cannot be revised.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 134 S.W. 704, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 645 (Tex. 1911).

134 S.W. 704 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rosemann v. United Railways Co.
194 S.W. 1088 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1917)