Wilson v. State of North Carolina
169 U.S. 600, 18 S. Ct. 949, 42 L. Ed. 873, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1510
Opinion
18 S.Ct. 949
42 L.Ed. 873
WILSON
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 559.
March 21, 1898.
R. O. Burton and Thomas N. Hill, for plaintiff in error.
J. C. MacRae, W. H. Day, and A. C. Avery, for defendant in error.
PER CURIAM.
In No. 558 (Wilson v. North Carolina, 18 Sup. Ct. 435) the same questions are involved and the same orders are made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. State of North Carolina, 169 U.S. 600, 18 S. Ct. 949, 42 L. Ed. 873, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1510 (1898).
169 U.S. 600 (Wilson v. State of North Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fugate v. Weston
157 S.E. 736 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1931)
In re Rice
181 F. 217 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Alabama, 1910)