Wilson v. State of North Carolina
169 U.S. 600, 18 S. Ct. 949, 42 L. Ed. 873, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1510
This text of 169 U.S. 600 (Wilson v. State of North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wilson v. State of North Carolina, 169 U.S. 600, 18 S. Ct. 949, 42 L. Ed. 873, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1510 (1898).
Opinion
18 S.Ct. 949
42 L.Ed. 873
WILSON
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 559.
March 21, 1898.
R. O. Burton and Thomas N. Hill, for plaintiff in error.
J. C. MacRae, W. H. Day, and A. C. Avery, for defendant in error.
PER CURIAM.
In No. 558 (Wilson v. North Carolina, 18 Sup. Ct. 435) the same questions are involved and the same orders are made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fugate v. Weston
157 S.E. 736 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1931)
In re Rice
181 F. 217 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Alabama, 1910)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
169 U.S. 600, 18 S. Ct. 949, 42 L. Ed. 873, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-state-of-north-carolina-scotus-1898.