Wilson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wilson v. State

209 S.W.3d 53, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1935, 2006 WL 3718042

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 861 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 19, 2006·No. No. ED 86519·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Halbert Wilson, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Halbert Wilson, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Wilson v. State, 209 S.W.3d 53, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1935, 2006 WL 3718042 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

209 S.W.3d 53 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.