Wilson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wilson v. State

785 S.W.2d 762, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 237, 1990 WL 11757

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 13, 1990

DocketNo. 56386

StatusPublished

This text of 785 S.W.2d 762 (Wilson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. State, 785 S.W.2d 762, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 237, 1990 WL 11757 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from an order of the trial court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. We find no error and the order is supported by competent and substantial evidence. A written opinion would have no precedential value. Parties have been furnished with a memorandum supplementing this order. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from an order of the trial court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. We find no error and the order is supported by competent and substantial evidence. A written opinion would have no precedential value. Parties have been furnished with a memorandum supplementing this order. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

785 S.W.2d 762, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 237, 1990 WL 11757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-state-moctapp-1990.