Wilson v. State
200 A.2d 683, 235 Md. 130, 1964 Md. LEXIS 726
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 239 Md. 245 →
Opinion
The only question raised by the appellant is an alleged insufficiency of the evidence to convict him. A reading of the record extract discloses ample evidence, if believed by the trier of facts, to warrant the conviction of larceny.
The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.
Judgement affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. State, 200 A.2d 683, 235 Md. 130, 1964 Md. LEXIS 726 (Md. 1964).
200 A.2d 683 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.