Wilson v. State

160 S.E. 123, 43 Ga. App. 770, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 546
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 4, 1931
Docket21591
StatusPublished

This text of 160 S.E. 123 (Wilson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. State, 160 S.E. 123, 43 Ga. App. 770, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 546 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court a ground of a motion for a new trial can not be considered by the reviewing court when the ground is not unqualifiedly approved by the trial judge. In the instant case special grounds 1 and 2 of the motion for a new trial are not so approved.

2. The remaining special ground of the motion for a new trial is expressly disapproved by the judge.

3. The verdict was amply authorized, if not demanded, by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 S.E. 123, 43 Ga. App. 770, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-state-gactapp-1931.