Wilson v. State

576 S.E.2d 852, 276 Ga. 149, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 299, 2003 Ga. LEXIS 67
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 27, 2003
DocketS03A0045
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 576 S.E.2d 852 (Wilson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. State, 576 S.E.2d 852, 276 Ga. 149, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 299, 2003 Ga. LEXIS 67 (Ga. 2003).

Opinion

Thompson, Justice.

Saleem Ahmed Wilson was convicted by a jury of malice murder, felony murder with the underlying felony of aggravated assault, and aggravated assault in connection with the stabbing death of Donnell Thomas.1 He was initially sentenced to life imprisonment for malice [150]*150murder and the trial court merged the two remaining offenses. On motion for new trial, however, the malice murder conviction was vacated and placed on the dead docket due to harmful error in the jury charge. The trial court resentenced Wilson to a life term for felony murder. On appeal, Wilson asserts that the same erroneous jury instruction mandates that his felony murder conviction be vacated as well. We disagree and affirm his conviction for felony murder.

The evidence established that on the day prior to the stabbing, Wilson had argued with and beaten his girlfriend, Latanya Sterling, because he believed she was also dating Thomas. The next afternoon, Thomas drove to Sterling’s home where he encountered Wilson in the front yard. The two men engaged in a fight during which Wilson fatally stabbed the victim in the chest. He then sped away in Thomas’ car. Sterling and two bystanders observed the altercation and saw Wilson flee the scene. Shortly thereafter, Wilson telephoned Thomas’ employer and claimed he had “beat him up,” and that Thomas “would be in the hospital.”

1. The evidence was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find Wilson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of felony murder while in the commission of an aggravated assault. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

2. In the context of the jury instruction on malice murder, the court charged as follows:

Malice may be formed in a moment, and instantly a mortal wound may be inflicted. Yet if malice is in the mind of the defendant or the accused at the time of the doing of the act or killing and if that’s what moves the accused to do it, such is sufficient to constitute the homicide as murder. To kill by using a deadly weapon in a manner likely to produce death will raise a presumption of intention to kill.

A similar charge on malice murder was held to be constitutionally defective in Pace v. State, 274 Ga. 69, 70 (548 SE2d 307) (2001) in that it “impermissibly shifted the burden of proof to [the accused] on the essential elements of intent and malice, thus violating the dictates of Sandstrom v. Montana, [442 U. S. 510 (99 SC 2450, 61 LE2d 39) (1979)] and Francis v. Franklin [471 U. S. 307 (105 SC 1965, 85 LE2d 344) (1985)].” See also Harris v. State, 273 Ga. 608, 610 (2) (543 SE2d 716) (2001) (use of “deadly weapon charge” is error).

Wilson asserts that the defective charge also misled the jury with regard to the offense of felony murder and that he is, therefore, [151]*151entitled to a new trial. We have reviewed the charges on felony murder and the underlying felony of aggravated assault and find that they were complete and correct statements of the law. The State elected to forego a reprosecution of Wilson for malice murder, leaving the court with the option of entering a judgment of conviction and sentence on the jury’s verdict of felony murder. That option was approved in Pace, supra at 70, where, as here, “the erroneous instructions on intent and malice were given specifically on the charge of malice murder.” Accordingly, we find no error.

Decided January 27, 2003. James D. Cooper, Jr., for appellant. Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Bettieanne C. Hart, Marc A. Mallon, Assistant District Attorneys, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Wylencia H. Monroe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ward v. State
718 S.E.2d 915 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
576 S.E.2d 852, 276 Ga. 149, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 299, 2003 Ga. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-state-ga-2003.