Wilson v. State
86 So. 3d 1158, 2012 WL 1414168, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6495
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5467 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Scott v. State, 66 So.3d 923, 930 (Fla.2011) (“[U]nder the ‘invited response’ doctrine, the State is permitted to emphasize uncontradicted evidence for the narrow purpose of rebutting a defense argument since the defense has invited the response.”) (citation and other internal quotations omitted).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. State, 86 So. 3d 1158, 2012 WL 1414168, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6495 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
86 So. 3d 1158 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Scott v. State
66 So. 3d 923 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)