Wilson v. State

4 So. 3d 1257, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2167, 2009 WL 633796
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 933 So. 2d 598
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 13, 2009·No. No. 1D08-5401·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, James A. Wilson, appeals the order summarily denying his postconviction relief motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Summary denial was proper as to claims one through three and five through seven. However, because claim four is facially sufficient, we reverse the order as to that claim and remand with instructions to either attach portions of the record that conclusively refute the claim or for an evidentiary hearing. See Foster v. State, 993 So.2d 97, 97 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (reversing and remanding with instructions to either attach portions of the record conclusively refuting the facially sufficient claims of ineffective assistance of counsel or for an evidentiary hearing).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with instructions.

DAVIS, BENTON, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 4 So. 3d 1257, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2167, 2009 WL 633796 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

4 So. 3d 1257 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foster v. State
993 So. 2d 97 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)