Wilson v. State
907 So. 2d 650, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11948, 2005 WL 1762436
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 27, 2005·No. No. 3D05-990·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
CONFESSION OF ERROR
Leroy Wilson appeals from denial of a 3.800 motion in which he claimed that his sentence as a habitual violent felony offender (HVFO) was illegal. Based on the State’s concession that Wilson’s sentence as a HVFO is illegal because Wilson has never been convicted of one of the predi[651]*651cate offenses enumerated in section 775.084(l)(b)l, Florida Statutes (2000), we vacate the HVFO sentence imposed and remand for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. State, 907 So. 2d 650, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11948, 2005 WL 1762436 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
907 So. 2d 650 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nish v. State
907 So. 2d 650 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)