Wilson v. State
708 So. 2d 695, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4593, 1998 WL 197548
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 668 So. 2d 998 →
Opinion
We find no error in the trial court’s adjudication of contempt, but the court’s failure to enter a written order including the factual basis for its judgment constitutes reversible error. We therefore remand for entry of a proper written order reciting the facts on which the contempt conviction was based. See Williams v. State, 698 So.2d 1350 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. State, 708 So. 2d 695, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4593, 1998 WL 197548 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
708 So. 2d 695 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. State
698 So. 2d 1350 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)