Wilson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Wilson v. State

196 So. 859, 143 Fla. 461, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1229

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 134 Fla. 390 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 21, 1940·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Writ of error is to judgment of conviction of murder in the second degree. The sole contention presented is that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict and judgment.

The record has been examined and the evidence found ample to support the verdict and judgment. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

*462 So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Ti-iomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Writ of error is to judgment of conviction of murder in the second degree. The sole contention presented is that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict and judgment.

The record has been examined and the evidence found ample to support the verdict and judgment. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

*462 So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Ti-iomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Wilson v. State, 196 So. 859, 143 Fla. 461, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1229 (Fla. 1940).

Pincite

196 So. 859 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.