Wilson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Wilson v. State

832 S.W.2d 854, 310 Ark. 294, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 488

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJuly 13, 1992

DocketCR 92-751

StatusPublished

This text of 832 S.W.2d 854 (Wilson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. State, 832 S.W.2d 854, 310 Ark. 294, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 488 (Ark. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Charles Wilson, by his attorney, Joseph C. Self has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Charles Wilson, by his attorney, Joseph C. Self has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

832 S.W.2d 854, 310 Ark. 294, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-state-ark-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack