Wilson v. State

134 So. 457, 24 Ala. App. 280, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 279
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 24, 1931
Docket8 Div. 295.
StatusPublished

This text of 134 So. 457 (Wilson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. State, 134 So. 457, 24 Ala. App. 280, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 279 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

It is insisted that the defendant’s .motion for a new trial should have been granted on account of the character and weight of the evidence. We have read the record and the evidence adduced on the trial, and, while the character of evidence'may not be as strong as in some cases, it was sufficient, if believed beyond a reasonable doubt, to warrant a verdict of guilt. Where this is the case, this court will not reverse the finding of the trial judge, who had the advantage of hearing and seeing the witnesses.

We find no prejudicial error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 So. 457, 24 Ala. App. 280, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-state-alactapp-1931.