Wilson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Wilson v. State

641 So. 2d 1260, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1021, 1993 WL 304521

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedAugust 13, 1993

DocketCR-92-586

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 641 So. 2d 1260 (Wilson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. State, 641 So. 2d 1260, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1021, 1993 WL 304521 (Ala. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

MONTIEL, Judge.

Kenneth Wilson filed a Rule 32, A.R.Cr.P., petition with the Jefferson Circuit Court alleging that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. Following a hearing, the circuit court denied the petition. However, the circuit court failed to make specific findings of fact as required by Rule 32.9(d), A.R.Crim.P. Saffold v. State, 563 So.2d 1074 (Ala.Crim.App.1990). Thus, this cause must be remanded to the circuit court.

The circuit court is ordered to file written findings of fact with this court within 60 days of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI