Wilson v. State

371 So. 2d 943
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedApril 20, 1979
Docket77-433
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 371 So. 2d 943 (Wilson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. State, 371 So. 2d 943 (Ala. 1979).

Opinion

ON REHEARING
The original opinion quashing the writ as having been improvidently granted is hereby withdrawn.

On original submission, this Court reviewed the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals and the proceedings in the trial court as provided for in Rule 39 (k) and Rule 45A, Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure,1 even though this cause was argued and submitted prior to the effective date of those rules.

After reviewing the opinion and the proceedings, we do not note any plain error or defect in the proceedings which has or probably has adversely affected the substantial rights of the petitioner.

The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals is due to be and is hereby affirmed. *Page 944

APPLICATION FOR REHEARING GRANTED; ORIGINAL OPINION WITHDRAWN; AFFIRMED.

All the Justices concur.

1 Rule 39 (k) and Rule 45A provide:

"In all cases in which the death penalty has been imposed, upon review of the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals on certiorari, the Supreme Court may notice any plain error or defect in the proceeding under review, whether or not brought to the attention of the trial court, and take appropriate appellate action by reason thereof, whenever such error has or probably has adversely affected the substantial rights of the petitioner."

"In all cases in which the death penalty has been imposed, the Court of Criminal Appeals shall notice any plain error or defect in the proceedings under review, whether or not brought to the attention of the trial court, and take appropriate appellate action by reason thereof, whenever such error has or probably has adversely affected the substantial right of the appellant."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arthur v. State
711 So. 2d 1031 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1996)
Hubbard v. State
500 So. 2d 1204 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Ex Parte Arthur
472 So. 2d 665 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1985)
Troha v. State
462 So. 2d 950 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)
Hill v. State
455 So. 2d 930 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)
Williams v. State
445 So. 2d 798 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1984)
Baldwin v. State
456 So. 2d 117 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1983)
Bailey v. State
421 So. 2d 1364 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1982)
Beck v. State
485 So. 2d 1196 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1982)
Dozier v. State
415 So. 2d 3 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1982)
Lidge v. State
419 So. 2d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1982)
Shoemaker v. Atchison
406 So. 2d 986 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1981)
Wilson v. State
405 So. 2d 696 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1981)
James v. State
405 So. 2d 71 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1981)
Wilson v. State
405 So. 2d 696 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1981)
Miles v. State
408 So. 2d 158 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1981)
Smith v. State
392 So. 2d 1273 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1980)
Williamson v. Alabama
448 U.S. 903 (Supreme Court, 1980)
Nelson v. State
405 So. 2d 392 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1980)
McGinnis v. State
382 So. 2d 605 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
371 So. 2d 943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-state-ala-1979.