Wilson v. Spring Hill Quartz-Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Wilson v. Spring Hill Quartz-Mining Co.

10 Cal. 445

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1858

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 Cal. 445 (Wilson v. Spring Hill Quartz-Mining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. Spring Hill Quartz-Mining Co., 10 Cal. 445 (Cal. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

Baldwin, J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Terry, C. J., concurring.

These cases only differ from the case of Rowe v. The Table Mountain Water Company in this, that here the complaint is against a trading company, and the service of the summons is returned executed upon the company, by service upon one Pendleton, one of the partners and associates. The principle applicable to the two classes of cases is not materially different.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldwin, J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Terry, C. J., concurring.

These cases only differ from the case of Rowe v. The Table Mountain Water Company in this, that here the complaint is against a trading company, and the service of the summons is returned executed upon the company, by service upon one Pendleton, one of the partners and associates. The principle applicable to the two classes of cases is not materially different.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Cal. 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-spring-hill-quartz-mining-co-cal-1858.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack