Wilson v. Small
102 S.E. 370, 25 Ga. App. 19, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 562
Opinion
When this ease was here before (20 Ga. App. 674, 93 S. E. 518), the controlling questions of law were settled by this court, and the rulings then made became the law of the ease. Upon the trial now under review the evidence did not demand the verdict [20] returned, and the court accordingly did not err in granting a new trial, it being the first grant thereof to the defendant in error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. Small, 102 S.E. 370, 25 Ga. App. 19, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 562 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).
102 S.E. 370 (Wilson v. Small) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilson v. Small
113 S.E. 238 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)