Wilson v. Small
This text of 102 S.E. 370 (Wilson v. Small) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
When this ease was here before (20 Ga. App. 674, 93 S. E. 518), the controlling questions of law were settled by this court, and the rulings then made became the law of the ease. Upon the trial now under review the evidence did not demand the verdict [20]*20returned, and the court accordingly did not err in granting a new trial, it being the first grant thereof to the defendant in error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 S.E. 370, 25 Ga. App. 19, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-small-gactapp-1920.