Wilson v. Small

102 S.E. 370, 25 Ga. App. 19, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 562
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 3, 1920
Docket11090
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 102 S.E. 370 (Wilson v. Small) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Small, 102 S.E. 370, 25 Ga. App. 19, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 562 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

When this ease was here before (20 Ga. App. 674, 93 S. E. 518), the controlling questions of law were settled by this court, and the rulings then made became the law of the ease. Upon the trial now under review the evidence did not demand the verdict [20]*20returned, and the court accordingly did not err in granting a new trial, it being the first grant thereof to the defendant in error.

Decided March 3, 1920. Trover; from city court of Macon — Judge Guerry. September 19, 1919. Hardeman, Jones, Park & Johnston, for plaintiff. Gunn & Powers, P. F. Brock, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. Small
113 S.E. 238 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 S.E. 370, 25 Ga. App. 19, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-small-gactapp-1920.