Wilson v. Skywest Airlines, Inc.

• Court: District Court, N.D. California
• Decided: March 29, 2021
• Docket: 3:19-cv-01491
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 |} Amanda C. Sommerfeld (State Bar No. 185052) asommerfeld@jonesday.com 2 || JONES DAY 555 South Flower Street, Fiftieth Floor 3 || Los Angeles, CA 90071.2300 Telephone: +1.213.489.3939 4 || Facsimile: = +1.213.243.2539 5 || Anthony J. Dick (admitted pro hac vice) ajdick@jonesday.com 6 || JONES DAY 51 Louisiana Avenue, N.W. 7 || Washington, D.C. 20001-2113 Telephone: +1.202.879.3939 8 || Facsimile: +1.202.626.1700 9 || Scott Morrison (SBN 320167) scottmorrison@jonesday.com 10 || JONES DAY 4655 Executive Drive, Suite 1500 11 || San Diego, CA 92121 Telephone: +1.858.314.1189 12 || Facsimile: +1.844.345.3178 13 || Attorneys for Defendant SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. 14 Plaintiffs’ counsel listed on next page 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 20 || TREMAINE WILSON, et al., Case No. 3:19-CV-01491-VC 21 Plaintiffs, JOINT STIPULATION SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON CROSS- 22 Vv. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND [PROPOSED] 23 || SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC., ORDER AS MODIFIED 24 Defendant. Judge: Hon. Vince Chhabria 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION; PROPOSED-ORDER CASE NO. 3:19-CV-01491-VC

1 || Matthew R. Bainer, Esq. (SBN 220972) THE BAINER LAW FIRM 2 || 1901 Harrison St., Suite 1100 Oakland, California 94612 3 || Telephone: (510) 922-1802 Facsimile: (510) 844-7701 4 || mbainer@bainerlawfirm.com 5 || Attorneys for Plaintiffs ‘ Tremaine Wilson and Lauren Becker 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION; PROPOSED ORDER ry CASE NO. 3:19-CV-01491-VC

1 On March 17, 2021, the Court held a Case Management Conference to discuss the parties’ 2 || cross motions for summary judgment in light of the Ninth Circuit’s recent ruling in Bernstein v. 3 || Virgin America, Inc., --- F.3d ---, 2021 WL 867583 (9th Cir. Feb. 23, 2021) (publication 4 || pending). Ultimately, the Court ordered the parties to file new cross motions for summary 5 || judgment. The Court set a hearing date on those cross motions for May 27, 2021, and ordered the 6 || parties to stipulate to a briefing schedule consistent with the Court’s Standing Order. 7 On March 19, 2021, one of SkyWest’s lawyers had an unexpected death in the immediate 8 || family and will be out of the office and traveling in order to get affairs in order. The Parties have 9 || conferred over a schedule that takes this into consideration and also affords them the time each 10 || believes is appropriate. Accordingly, the Parties jointly request a brief continuance of the hearing 11 || on their cross-motions for summary judgment to June 17, 2021. The Parties stipulate to the 12 || following briefing schedule in light of that continuance, which respects the Court’s Standing 13 || Order by allowing two weeks between the fourth brief and the hearing date and more than seven 14 || weeks between the first brief and the hearing date. I 6

18 || | opposition 22 23 || IT IS SO STIPULATED. /// /// 20 /// 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION; PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. 3:19-CV-01491-VC

| DATED: March 24, 2021 Respectfully submitted, 2 3 By: s/ Amanda Sommerfeld Amanda C. Sommerfeld 4 Scott Morrison Anthony Dick 5 JONES DAY 6 Attorneys for Defendants SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. 7 g DATED: March 24, 2021 By: Matthew Bainer Matthew R. Bainer 9 THE BAINER LAW FIRM 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs TREMAINE WILSON and LAUREN BECKER and the Class 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION; PROPOSED ORDER ry CASE NO. 3:19-CV-0149]1-VC

1 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3) 2 I, Amanda C. Sommerfeld, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 3 || obtained from the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the 4 || United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. 5 Executed this 24th day of March, 2021, at Los Angeles, California. 6 s/_ Amanda Sommerfeld 7 AMANDA C. SOMMERFELD 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION; PROPOSED ORDER 7 CASE NO. 3:19-CV-0149]1-VC

l [PROPOSED] ORDER AS MODIFIED 9 |) PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 | DATED- March 29. 2021 LEE [RS SS | yr 1s SO oR 6 ~ woe □ bri2 . \\ Lo A SS 10 DISTRICS 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION; PROPOSED-ORDER CASE NO. 3:19-CV-01491-VC