Wilson v. Simler

Supreme Court

Wilson v. Simler

350 U.S. 892, 76 S. Ct. 153

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 14, 1955·No. No. 409·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments of the Court of Appeals are vacated and the judgments of the District Court reinstated. Sutton v. English, 246 U. S. 199. See Markham v. Allen, 326 U. S. 490, 494; Pufahl v. Estate of Parks, 299 U. S. 217, 226.

Mr. Jus[893]*893tice Black dissents. Porter R. Chandler, Fred E. Suits and John B. Dudley for petitioners. Leslie L. Conner and Charles W. Conner for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments of the Court of Appeals are vacated and the judgments of the District Court reinstated. Sutton v. English, 246 U. S. 199. See Markham v. Allen, 326 U. S. 490, 494; Pufahl v. Estate of Parks, 299 U. S. 217, 226.

Mr. Jus[893]*893tice Black dissents. Porter R. Chandler, Fred E. Suits and John B. Dudley for petitioners. Leslie L. Conner and Charles W. Conner for respondent.

Wilson v. Simler, 350 U.S. 892, 76 S. Ct. 153 (1955).

Pincite

350 U.S. 892 (Wilson v. Simler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related