Wilson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedJanuary 27, 2025
Docket23-1142V
StatusUnpublished

This text of Wilson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Wilson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2025).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-1142V

CHRISTINE WILSON, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: December 16, 2024 v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Jessica Anne Olins, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Julianna Rose Kober, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

On July 24, 2023, Christine Wilson, filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a Table injury – shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of the administration of an influenza ("flu") vaccination on February 25, 2022. Stipulation filed December 2, 2024, at ¶¶ 1-2, 4; see Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1, 26, 30. Petitioner further alleges that she received the vaccine in the United States, that she suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action on her behalf as a result of her injury. Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5; see Petition at ¶¶ 1, 28, 31-32. “Respondent denies that [P]etitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the vaccine caused [P]etitioner’s alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury; and denies that her current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Nevertheless, on December 2, 2024, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, 3 stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A. A lump sum of $48,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner; and

B. A lump sum of $6,032.83, representing reimbursement of a Medicaid lien for services rendered to Petitioner by the State of South Carolina, in the form of a check payable jointly to Petitioner and Amerigroup:

Carelon Subrogation Attn: Patricia Wyland PO Box 659940 San Antonio, TX 78265-9939

Petitioner agrees to endorse this check to Amerigroup.

Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 The Nintex AssureSign “Document Completion Report” located at pages seven and eight of the parties’

Stipulation has been omitted from the attached copy of the Stipulation.

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2 lN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

CHRISTlNE WILSON,

Petitioner,

v. No. 23-l 142V Chief Special Master Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES,

STIPJJJ,ATIQN The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

I. On July 24, 2023, Christine Wilson ("petitioner"}, filed a petition for vaccine

compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10

to -34 (the "Vaccine Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to

petitioner's receipt of an influenza ("flu") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine

Injury Table (the "Table,,), 42 C.F.R. § I00.3(a).

2. Petitioner received a flu vaccine on February 25, 2022.
3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that she sustained a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration ("SIRVA") within the time period set forth in the Table. She further alleges that

she experienced the residual effects of this condition for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil

action for damages on her behalf as a result of her alleged injury.

6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the vaccine caused petitioner's alleged shoulder injury. or any other injury; and denies that her

current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that

the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry ofjudgment reflecting a decision consistent

with the tenns of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive

compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human

Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payments:

A. A lump sum of $48,000.00 in the fonn of a check payable to petitioner; and

B. A lump sum of $6,032.83, 1 representing reimbursement of a Medicaid lien for services rendered to petitioner by the State of South Carolina, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and Amerigroup:

Carelon Subrogation Attn: Patricia Wyland PO Box 659940 San Antonio, TX 78265-9939

Petitioner agrees to endorse this check to Amerigroup. These amounts represent

compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry ofjudgment on entitlement in this case, and

after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
§ 300aa-2l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l)
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wilson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2025.