Wilson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided September 17, 2021·No. 20-1771·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-1771V UNPUBLISHED

JOEL WILSON, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: August 17, 2021 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer; HUMAN SERVICES, Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Influenza Respondent. (Flu); Brachial Neuritis

Kathleen Margaret Loucks, Lommen Abdo Law Firm. Minneapolis, MN, for Petitioner.

Wei Kit Tai, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On December 7, 2020, Joel Wilson filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered brachial neuritis of the left arm and shoulder as a result of influenza (“flu”) and tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccines administered to him on December 13, 2018. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On June 28, 2021, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On August 17, 2021, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $57,492.99 (comprised of $55,000.00 for pain and suffering and $2,492.99 for past unreimbursable expenses). Proffer at 2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $$57,492.99 (comprised of $55,000.00 for pain and suffering and $2,492.99 for past unreimbursable expenses) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) JOEL WILSON, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 20-1771V v. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) )

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On December 7, 2020, Joel Wilson (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under

the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act”

or “Act”), alleging that he suffered a brachial neuritis of the left shoulder as a result of an

influenza (“flu”) and tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine administered to

him on December 13, 2018.

On June 28, 2021, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a

Vaccine Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation under the

terms of the Act for a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) Table injury.1

ECF No. 20. On June 28, 2021, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding

petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 21.

1 Respondent does not concede that petitioner suffered brachial neuritis (“BN”) or that any alleged symptoms of BN were causally related to vaccine administration. Accordingly, the proffer on award of compensation is limited to petitioner’s SIRVA only. I. Items of Compensation

A. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $55,000.00 in pain and suffering.

See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.

B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that he incurred past unreimbursable expenses

related to his vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past

unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $2,492.99. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(B).

Petitioner agrees.

The above amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a

lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and

the Court’s judgment award the following2: a lump sum payment of $57,492.99, in the form of a

check payable to petitioner.

III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment

Lump sum payable to petitioner, Joel Wilson: $57,492.99

2 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings and future pain and suffering. 2 Respectfully submitted,

BRIAN M. BOYNTON Acting Assistant Attorney General

C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

DARRYL R. WISHARD Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

s/ Wei Kit (Ricky) Tai WEI KIT (RICKY) TAI Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Direct dial: (202) 598-7705 Wei.Tai@usdoj.gov

Dated: August 17, 2021

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2021).

Wilson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Wilson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a