Wilson v. Scoville

20 N.E. 88, 127 Ill. 393
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 21, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 N.E. 88 (Wilson v. Scoville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Scoville, 20 N.E. 88, 127 Ill. 393 (Ill. 1889).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Bailey

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is a motion by the appellant for a continuance for the purjiose of enabling him to obtain from the judges of the Appellate Court a certificate that the case is of such importance, on account of direct or collateral interests that it should be passed upon by this court. It is admitted that the amount involved is less than $1000, and that the case is not otherwise one of which this court can have jurisdiction without such certificate. We think the motion must be denied for two reasons. First, such certificate is a condition precedent to perfecting an appeal, and if it were granted now, ex post facto, it would not have the effect to validate an appeal which has already been improvidently taken. Second, if this were otherwise, the judgment of the Appellate Court was rendered on the 25th day of May last, and as we have held in MacLachlan v. McLaughlin, 126 Ill. 427, the Appellate Court had jurisdiction to grant a certificate only for the period during which an appeal could be taken, that is twenty days after the entry of judgment. It is therefore now too late to apply to that court for a certificate, and a continuance for that purpose would be unavailing.

■ As it is apparent that this court has not and can not have jurisdiction, the appeal will be dismissed at the costs of the appellant, and leave is given him to withdraw the record for the purpose of returning it to the Appellate Court.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Godfrey v. Wingert
110 Ill. App. 563 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 N.E. 88, 127 Ill. 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-scoville-ill-1889.