Wilson v. School Board of Palm Beach County

660 So. 2d 407, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9769, 1995 WL 548854
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 18, 1995·No. No. 94-2463·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The claimant appeals a workers’ compensation order by which the judge denied certain claims, relying on the opinions of two examining doctors. While two treating doctors rendered contrary opinions, and all of these doctors testified by deposition, the resolution of such conflict is within the fact-finding authority of the judge of compensation claims. Johnson v. Martin Paving, 659 So.2d 347 (Fla. 1st DCA April 11, 1995); Florida Mining & Materials v. Mobley, 649 So.2d 934 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). This court will not retry the case on appeal, and will defer to permissible interpretations of the deposition testimony and inferences derived therefrom. Johnson. Because such review reveals competent substantial evidence to support the challenged ruling, the appealed order is affirmed.

ALLEN and DAVIS, JJ., and SHIVERS, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. School Board of Palm Beach County, 660 So. 2d 407, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9769, 1995 WL 548854 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

660 So. 2d 407 (Wilson v. School Board of Palm Beach County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris Corp. v. Connor
695 So. 2d 498 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Frederick v. United Airlines
688 So. 2d 412 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)