Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Wilson v. Sandall

Wilson v. Sandall

113 A. 927, 92 N.J. Eq. 463, 7 Stock. 463, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 238
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 28, 1921·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzbnbaci-i, White, ITeprenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Aokerson—15. . For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Sandall, 113 A. 927, 92 N.J. Eq. 463, 7 Stock. 463, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 238 (N.J. 1921).

113 A. 927 (Wilson v. Sandall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Union Cemetery Assn.
46 A.2d 728 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)
Oliver v. Autographic Register Co.
7 A.2d 797 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)