Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Wilson v. Sandall

Wilson v. Sandall

113 A. 927, 92 N.J. Eq. 463, 7 Stock. 463, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 238
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 28, 1921
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 113 A. 927 (Wilson v. Sandall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Sandall, 113 A. 927, 92 N.J. Eq. 463, 7 Stock. 463, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 238 (N.J. 1921).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzbnbaci-i, White, ITeprenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Aokerson—15. . For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Union Cemetery Assn.
46 A.2d 728 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)
Oliver v. Autographic Register Co.
7 A.2d 797 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 A. 927, 92 N.J. Eq. 463, 7 Stock. 463, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-sandall-nj-1921.