Wilson v. Russell

40 Iowa 697
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedMarch 19, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 Iowa 697 (Wilson v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Russell, 40 Iowa 697 (iowa 1875).

Opinion

Beck, J.

Judgment was rendered against defendant by default in an action upon an account. The judgment drew interest at ten per cent, per annum. By proper motion defendant asked its correction, so that it would draw interest at the rate of six per cent, per annum. The motion was overruled, and defendant appealed from the judgment thereon. Pending the appeal, and before it was filed in this court, plaintiffs confessed the error of the judgment in awarding ten instead of six per cent, per annum interest, and entered a remittitur to that effect of record at a subsequent term. After this the appeal was brought into this court. It must be dismissed. There is no question depending before us in the case wherein the rights of the parties are involved. The plaintiffs have conceded to defendant all he expected to effect by the appeal. All costs of the appeal accruing after the remittitur will be taxed against appellant.

Our time is too fully occupied by cases wherein are contests involving real interests of parties to permit us to hear cases in which there is nothing in controversy.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Princeton Coal & Mining Co. v. Gilmore
83 N.E. 500 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 Iowa 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-russell-iowa-1875.