Wilson v. Rudgers
This text of 56 F. App'x 368 (Wilson v. Rudgers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Michael Wilson, California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to medical needs.
We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dis[369]*369trict court’s grant of summary judgment, Sorrels v. McKee, 290 F.3d 965, 969 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment because Wilson failed to exhaust administrative remedies by not pursuing his complaint through all four stages of the grievance procedure as required by the California Department of Corrections. See Booth v. Chumer, 532 U.S. 731, 734, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001) (requiring exhaustion prior to filing suit in federal court).
We deny all pending motions.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F. App'x 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-rudgers-ca9-2003.