Wilson v. Royal Exchange Shipping Co.

E.D. New York

Wilson v. Royal Exchange Shipping Co.

24 F. 815, 1884 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219

DecidedDecember 31, 1884

StatusPublished

This text of 24 F. 815 (Wilson v. Royal Exchange Shipping Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. Royal Exchange Shipping Co., 24 F. 815, 1884 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219 (E.D.N.Y. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Benedict, J.

The answer, to which exception is taken, avers that the libelants were notified of the readiness of the steamer to deliver the goods mentioned in the bill of lading sued on, and thereupon informed the owners of the steamer that they, the libelants, were not in a position to take the goods, and that Jacob D. Nordlinger was the owner of the goods. This was, in legal effect, a refusal on the part of the libelants to receive the goods. Upon such refusal the only duty attaching to the ship was to keep the goods for the owner. This duty they discharged when they delivered the goods to Nordlinger..

The exceptions to the answer must be overruled and the libel dismissed, unless libelants notice the cause for trial, and pay the costs of this hearing within 20 days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benedict, J.

The answer, to which exception is taken, avers that the libelants were notified of the readiness of the steamer to deliver the goods mentioned in the bill of lading sued on, and thereupon informed the owners of the steamer that they, the libelants, were not in a position to take the goods, and that Jacob D. Nordlinger was the owner of the goods. This was, in legal effect, a refusal on the part of the libelants to receive the goods. Upon such refusal the only duty attaching to the ship was to keep the goods for the owner. This duty they discharged when they delivered the goods to Nordlinger..

The exceptions to the answer must be overruled and the libel dismissed, unless libelants notice the cause for trial, and pay the costs of this hearing within 20 days.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 F. 815, 1884 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-royal-exchange-shipping-co-nyed-1884.