Wilson v. Rourke

Supreme Court of Georgia

Wilson v. Rourke

143 S.E. 374, 166 Ga. 458, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 325

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 18, 1928

DocketNo. 6472

StatusPublished

This text of 143 S.E. 374 (Wilson v. Rourke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. Rourke, 143 S.E. 374, 166 Ga. 458, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 325 (Ga. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

I. The trial court, in such cases as this, has a large discretion which will not be controlled unless abused. We can not say that there was any abuse of discretion in this case.

2. The petition was not subject to general demurrer, nor was it error to allow the amendments thereto.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. George II. Richter, for plaintiff in error. Shelby Myriclc, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

I. The trial court, in such cases as this, has a large discretion which will not be controlled unless abused. We can not say that there was any abuse of discretion in this case.

2. The petition was not subject to general demurrer, nor was it error to allow the amendments thereto.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. George II. Richter, for plaintiff in error. Shelby Myriclc, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 S.E. 374, 166 Ga. 458, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-rourke-ga-1928.