Wilson v. Robinson

104 So. 2d 124, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2954
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 3, 1958
DocketNo. 57-474
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 104 So. 2d 124 (Wilson v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Robinson, 104 So. 2d 124, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2954 (Fla. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the rule stated in American Mercantile Co. v. Circular Advertising Co., 71 Fla. 522, 71 So. 607, 608, to the effect that when testimony for a defendant was uncertain and not sufficient to sustain a verdict for the defendant, there was no error in directing a verdict for the plainjiff who successfully carried the burden of proof on the issues presented.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Binz v. Helvetia Florida Enterprises
104 So. 2d 124 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 So. 2d 124, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-robinson-fladistctapp-1958.