Wilson v. Robinson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wilson v. Robinson

104 So. 2d 124, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2954

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 3, 1958·No. No. 57-474·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the rule stated in American Mercantile Co. v. Circular Advertising Co., 71 Fla. 522, 71 So. 607, 608, to the effect that when testimony for a defendant was uncertain and not sufficient to sustain a verdict for the defendant, there was no error in directing a verdict for the plainjiff who successfully carried the burden of proof on the issues presented.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the rule stated in American Mercantile Co. v. Circular Advertising Co., 71 Fla. 522, 71 So. 607, 608, to the effect that when testimony for a defendant was uncertain and not sufficient to sustain a verdict for the defendant, there was no error in directing a verdict for the plainjiff who successfully carried the burden of proof on the issues presented.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Wilson v. Robinson, 104 So. 2d 124, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2954 (Fla. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

104 So. 2d 124 (Wilson v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related