Wilson v. Robinson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 30, 2006·No. 06-6299·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6299

NATHAN WILSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID ROBINSON,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00062-sgw)

Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 30, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathan Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Nathan Wilson appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Wilson v. Robinson, No. 7:06-cv-00062-sgw (W.D. Va. Jan.

25, 2006; Feb. 2, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Robinson, (4th Cir. 2006).

Wilson v. Robinson (Wilson v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)