Wilson v. Ray

Chatham Superior Court, Ga.

Wilson v. Ray

1 Charlton 109

DecidedJanuary 15, 1807

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Charlton 109 (Wilson v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Chatham Superior Court, Ga. primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. Ray, 1 Charlton 109 (Ga. Super. Ct. 1807).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Jones, Judge.

Upon the first view of this case, I was inclined to believe, that the inferior court could not authorise the amendment; but the statute of jeofails, 21 Jac. 1. c. 13, and the subsequent statutes extend to all courts of record. I am, therefore, after mature consideration, of opinion, that, under all the circumstances of the case, the additional return of the late sheriff Norton, ought to be received, and that the plaintiff should be permitted to proceed.

Proceedings removed.

Stites, in support of the certiorari.

Davis and Berrien, against it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Jones, Judge.

Upon the first view of this case, I was inclined to believe, that the inferior court could not authorise the amendment; but the statute of jeofails, 21 Jac. 1. c. 13, and the subsequent statutes extend to all courts of record. I am, therefore, after mature consideration, of opinion, that, under all the circumstances of the case, the additional return of the late sheriff Norton, ought to be received, and that the plaintiff should be permitted to proceed.

Proceedings removed.

Stites, in support of the certiorari.

Davis and Berrien, against it.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Charlton 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-ray-gasuperctchatha-1807.