Wilson v. Ray

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. Ray. Read the opinion of the Court — 391 F. App'x 273
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 17, 2010·No. 09-8016·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8016

FRED LEWIS WILSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

TRACY RAY, Warden; ASSISTANT WARDEN, ROSP; L. COLLINS, Sergeant; D. MCCOWAN, Sergeant; TONY ADAMS, I.I.; J. BLEVINS, Lieutenant,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:09-cv-00418-gec-mfu)

Submitted: July 28, 2010 Decided: August 17, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fred Lewis Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Fred Lewis Wilson appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) inmate civil rights

action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny Wilson’s motion for injunctive

relief pending appeal and affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Wilson v. Ray, No. 7:09-cv-00418-gec-mfu (W.D.

Va. Oct. 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Ray, (4th Cir. 2010).

Wilson v. Ray (Wilson v. Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related