Wilson v. Principi

17 Vet. App. 19, 2003 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 108, 2003 WL 367545
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims·Decided February 21, 2003·No. 01-691·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The appellant, through counsel, filed an application for an award of attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The Court issued an opinion on December 12, 2002, awarding attorneys fees in an amount less than was sought by the appellant. Wilson v. Principi, 16 Vet.App. 509 [20] (2002). On January 21, 2003, the appellant filed a timely motion for reconsideration by the panel. In essence, he reiterates arguments presented previously in his brief and at oral argument before the Court. “[A] motion for ... panel [reconsideration] ... must state the points of law or fact that the party believes the Court has overlooked or misunderstood.” U.S. Vet.App. R. 35(e)(1). The Court did not overlook or misunderstand any argument that was properly before it. The appellant has not presented any argument that warrants reconsideration by the panel.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the motion for a reconsideration by the panel is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Principi, 17 Vet. App. 19, 2003 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 108, 2003 WL 367545 (Cal. 2003).

17 Vet. App. 19 (Wilson v. Principi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. Principi
391 F.3d 1203 (Federal Circuit, 2004)
Samuel v. Barnhart
316 F. Supp. 2d 768 (E.D. Wisconsin, 2004)
Daniel E. Abbey v. Anthony J. Principi
17 Vet. App. 282 (Veterans Claims, 2003)
Abbey v. Principi
17 Vet. App. 75 (Veterans Claims, 2003)