Wilson v. Pennsylvania, Poughkeepsie & Boston Railroad
This text of 44 A. 850 (Wilson v. Pennsylvania, Poughkeepsie & Boston Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The lands of Augustus Trimmer were condemned by the railroad company. The award of the commissioners not proving satisfactory to the company, an appeal was taken and the case was tried at the Warren county Circuit Court in December last, which resulted in a verdict of $7,250.29, for the executor of Trimmer.
Thereupon the trial judge granted a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial, and certified the entire testimony taken on the trial before him for the advisory opinion of the Supreme Court as to whether a new trial should be granted.
Questions of disputed fact are thereby submitted to this court for settlement. The statute authorizing the Circuit Court to call for an advisory opinion does not give this court the capacity to decide questions of fact. The Circuit judge must make and state the facts upon which the questions of law will arise.
[45]*45This is the established practice in this state, and under the authority of Destefano v. Calandriello, 28 Vroom 483, the case must be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 A. 850, 64 N.J.L. 44, 35 Vroom 44, 1899 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-pennsylvania-poughkeepsie-boston-railroad-nj-1899.