Wilson v. Pan-American Bus Lines, Inc.

217 N.C. 586
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 22, 1940·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

Tbe plaintiff was a passenger on defendant’s bus. He did not lose bis rights as such in tbe circumstances disclosed by tbe record by leaving tbe bus temporarily for a lawful purpose. Wallace v. R. R., 174 N. C., 171, 93 S. E., 731. His status was that of a passenger at tbe time of tbe assault. Goodman v. Queen City Lines, 208 N. C., 323, 180 S. E., 661.

Whether tbe employees of tbe defendant could have come to bis rescue, and negligently failed to do so, after discovering bis peril, was submitted to tbe jury under proper instructions from tbe court. Mills v. R. R., 172 N. C., 266, 90 S. E., 221. The evidence on this issue was conflicting. Pruett v. R. R., 164 N. C., 3, 80 S. E., 65.

We have discovered no reversible error. Tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Pan-American Bus Lines, Inc., 217 N.C. 586 (N.C. 1940).

217 N.C. 586 (Wilson v. Pan-American Bus Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herman v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
40 A.D.2d 850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)
Emerson v. Carolina Cas. Ins. Co
206 F.2d 13 (Eighth Circuit, 1953)