Wilson v. Pan-American Bus Lines, Inc.

217 N.C. 586
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 22, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 217 N.C. 586 (Wilson v. Pan-American Bus Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Pan-American Bus Lines, Inc., 217 N.C. 586 (N.C. 1940).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

Tbe plaintiff was a passenger on defendant’s bus. He did not lose bis rights as such in tbe circumstances disclosed by tbe record by leaving tbe bus temporarily for a lawful purpose. Wallace v. R. R., 174 N. C., 171, 93 S. E., 731. His status was that of a passenger at tbe time of tbe assault. Goodman v. Queen City Lines, 208 N. C., 323, 180 S. E., 661.

Whether tbe employees of tbe defendant could have come to bis rescue, and negligently failed to do so, after discovering bis peril, was submitted to tbe jury under proper instructions from tbe court. Mills v. R. R., 172 N. C., 266, 90 S. E., 221. The evidence on this issue was conflicting. Pruett v. R. R., 164 N. C., 3, 80 S. E., 65.

We have discovered no reversible error. Tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herman v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
40 A.D.2d 850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)
Emerson v. Carolina Cas. Ins. Co
206 F.2d 13 (Eighth Circuit, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 N.C. 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-pan-american-bus-lines-inc-nc-1940.