Wilson v. Oregon Board of Parole

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Wilson v. Oregon Board of Parole

741 P.2d 931, 87 Or. App. 200, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 4513

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedSeptember 2, 1987

DocketCA A37522

StatusPublished

This text of 741 P.2d 931 (Wilson v. Oregon Board of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. Oregon Board of Parole, 741 P.2d 931, 87 Or. App. 200, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 4513 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner was convicted of several crimes committed in Multnomah County, and his sentences for those crimes include a 10-year minimum, which the Board of Parole (Board) sustained. The Board enhanced that minimum by eight months, because of injury and threats of injury to the victims of the crimes. Petitioner was later convicted of crimes in Clackamas County, and a five-year sentence was imposed, to run consecutively to the sentences for the Multnomah County convictions. The Board concedes that, in calculating petitioner’s release date under OAR 255-35-022, an incorrect “history risk score” arising from the Clackamas County convictions was assigned. We therefore reverse and remand for a recalculation of petitioner’s release date, using the correct history risk score.

We have considered petitioner’s other assignments of error and conclude that they lack merit and do not require discussion.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded for recalculation of petitioner’s release date.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioner was convicted of several crimes committed in Multnomah County, and his sentences for those crimes include a 10-year minimum, which the Board of Parole (Board) sustained. The Board enhanced that minimum by eight months, because of injury and threats of injury to the victims of the crimes. Petitioner was later convicted of crimes in Clackamas County, and a five-year sentence was imposed, to run consecutively to the sentences for the Multnomah County convictions. The Board concedes that, in calculating petitioner’s release date under OAR 255-35-022, an incorrect “history risk score” arising from the Clackamas County convictions was assigned. We therefore reverse and remand for a recalculation of petitioner’s release date, using the correct history risk score.

We have considered petitioner’s other assignments of error and conclude that they lack merit and do not require discussion.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded for recalculation of petitioner’s release date.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

741 P.2d 931, 87 Or. App. 200, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 4513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-oregon-board-of-parole-orctapp-1987.