Wilson v. O'Neill
91 A. 644, 86 N.J.L. 377, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 279
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Cítancelloii, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenburgii, White, Heppenheimer, JJ. 10.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. O'Neill, 91 A. 644, 86 N.J.L. 377, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 279 (N.J. 1914).
91 A. 644 (Wilson v. O'Neill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Milton v. Dept. of Civil Service
176 A.2d 492 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Falcey v. Civil Service Commission
106 A.2d 549 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1954)