Wilson v. Office of the Attorney General of N.Y.

109 F. App'x 476
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided September 27, 2004·No. No. 03-9280·Published

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff-Appellant Donna Faye Wilson brought suit alleging a host of civil rights violations. The district court (Scullin, C.J.) dismissed Wilson’s complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

Although dismissals with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 are disfavored, there are some unusual circumstances where they are appropriate. This case, for the reasons given by the district court, represents one such instance. We have consid[477]*477ered all of Plaintiffs claims and find them to be without merit. The district court’s judgment is therefore AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Office of the Attorney General of N.Y., 109 F. App'x 476 (2d Cir. 2004).

109 F. App'x 476 (Wilson v. Office of the Attorney General of N.Y.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)