Wilson v. Office of the Attorney General of N.Y.
This text of 109 F. App'x 476 (Wilson v. Office of the Attorney General of N.Y.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.
Plaintiff-Appellant Donna Faye Wilson brought suit alleging a host of civil rights violations. The district court (Scullin, C.J.) dismissed Wilson’s complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
Although dismissals with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 are disfavored, there are some unusual circumstances where they are appropriate. This case, for the reasons given by the district court, represents one such instance. We have consid[477]*477ered all of Plaintiffs claims and find them to be without merit. The district court’s judgment is therefore AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 F. App'x 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-office-of-the-attorney-general-of-ny-ca2-2004.