Wilson v. North Carolina Department of Correction
This text of 177 F. App'x 326 (Wilson v. North Carolina Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Paula M. Wilson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant and dismissing her gender discrimination claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Wilson v. North Carolina Dep’t of Correction, No. CA-03-228-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 2005). Additionally, as the materials contained in the “Appendix” to Wilson’s informal appellate brief were not presented, in their entirety, to the district court, we grant the Defendant’s motion to strike and so strike the “Appendix” from the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 F. App'x 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-north-carolina-department-of-correction-ca4-2006.