Wilson v. New York State Liquor Authority

417 N.E.2d 569, 52 N.Y.2d 741, 436 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2846
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 16, 1980·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the determination of the authority reinstated, with costs.

In this case the petitioner, who sought a grocery store beer license, is married to a Deputy Sheriff who concededly is a field officer performing criminal law enforcement duties (see, also, CPL 1.20, subd 34, par [b]). In addition it is [743] noted that the premises for which the license was sought is jointly owned by the petitioner and her husband. Under these circumstances it cannot be said that the authority acted irrationally in concluding that a granting of this application would give a police officer an indirect interest in the licensed sale of alcoholic beverages, in violation of section 128 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. New York State Liquor Authority, 417 N.E.2d 569, 52 N.Y.2d 741, 436 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2846 (N.Y. 1980).

417 N.E.2d 569 (Wilson v. New York State Liquor Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Opn. No.
New York Attorney General Reports, 1998
Connell v. Signoracci
153 F.3d 74 (Second Circuit, 1998)