Wilson v. New York Power Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wilson v. New York Power Authority

219 A.D.2d 868, 632 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11013

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 1995·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for an order directing plaintiff to submit to a psychological examination (see, CPLR 3121 [a]). Plaintiff has not sought damages for psychological injury or otherwise placed his mental condition in controversy (see, Zimmer v Cathedral School of St. Mary & St. Paul, 204 AD2d 538; cf., LaBossiere v Hudson, 187 AD2d 411; Starling v Warshowski, 148 AD2d 441). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Nicholson, J. — Discovery.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for an order directing plaintiff to submit to a psychological examination (see, CPLR 3121 [a]). Plaintiff has not sought damages for psychological injury or otherwise placed his mental condition in controversy (see, Zimmer v Cathedral School of St. Mary & St. Paul, 204 AD2d 538; cf., LaBossiere v Hudson, 187 AD2d 411; Starling v Warshowski, 148 AD2d 441). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Nicholson, J. — Discovery.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.

Wilson v. New York Power Authority, 219 A.D.2d 868, 632 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11013 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

219 A.D.2d 868 (Wilson v. New York Power Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related