Wilson v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wilson v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.

115 A.D. 922, 101 N.Y.S. 1149

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 115 A.D. 922 (Wilson v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co., 115 A.D. 922, 101 N.Y.S. 1149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event upon questions of law and fact. Held, that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law; that the finding of "the jury that the defendant was guilty of negligence which contributed to the injury is against the weight of the evidence, and also that there are reversible errors in the charge. AU concurred; Spring, J., on first ground only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event upon questions of law and fact. Held, that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law; that the finding of "the jury that the defendant was guilty of negligence which contributed to the injury is against the weight of the evidence, and also that there are reversible errors in the charge. AU concurred; Spring, J., on first ground only.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D. 922, 101 N.Y.S. 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-new-york-ontario-western-railway-co-nyappdiv-1906.