Wilson v. National Seating & Mobility, Inc.
812 So. 2d 580, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4270, 2002 WL 491890
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 2002·No. No. 3D01-3524·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Lana Wilson, plaintiff below, appeals from an order denying her motion for relief from judgment. We find no abuse of discretion, gross or otherwise, in the order on appeal, and affirm the judgment. See Schwab & Co. v. Breezy Bay, Inc., 360 So.2d 117, 118 (Fla. 3 DCA 1978) (“The discretion reposed in the trial judge by Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540 is of the broadest scope and in order to reverse a judge’s ruling thereunder, there must be a gross abuse of discretion.”).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. National Seating & Mobility, Inc., 812 So. 2d 580, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4270, 2002 WL 491890 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
812 So. 2d 580 (Wilson v. National Seating & Mobility, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Berti v. Cedars Healthcare Group, Ltd.
812 So. 2d 580 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)