Wilson v. Moore
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7239
RONALD M. WILSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL MOORE; CHARLES M. CONDON,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Robert S. Carr, Magistrate Judge. (CA-96-3464-5-18AJ)
Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 9, 1998
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald M. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &
Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. Wilson v. Moore, No. CA-96-3464-5-18AJ (D.S.C. Aug. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. Moore (Wilson v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.