Wilson v. Mohn

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wilson v. Mohn

340 S.W.3d 347, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 566, 2011 WL 1542836

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 26, 2011

DocketWD 72108

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 340 S.W.3d 347 (Wilson v. Mohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. Mohn, 340 S.W.3d 347, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 566, 2011 WL 1542836 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Appellants Belle Wilson and Shareen Vickers appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri (“trial court”) entered in favor of defendants Jay Mohn and Gordman’s, Inc., following a jury trial on Wilson’s and Vickers’s claims of false imprisonment and offensive contact. On appeal, Wilson and Vickers allege that the trial court erred in admitting a .videotape into evidence over their lawyer’s objection as to *348 its foundation. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Appellants Belle Wilson and Shareen Vickers appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri (“trial court”) entered in favor of defendants Jay Mohn and Gordman’s, Inc., following a jury trial on Wilson’s and Vickers’s claims of false imprisonment and offensive contact. On appeal, Wilson and Vickers allege that the trial court erred in admitting a .videotape into evidence over their lawyer’s objection as to *348 its foundation. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

340 S.W.3d 347, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 566, 2011 WL 1542836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-mohn-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack