Wilson v. Mitton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Wilson v. Mitton

101 A. 316, 257 Pa. 86, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 685

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 12, 1917·No. Appeal, No. 208·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is a close case, and the jury might very fairly have found in favor of the defendant, not only on the question of the alleged negligence of his driver, but also on the contributory negligence of the plaintiff. We are of the opinion, however, after an examination of all the testimony, that both of these questions were for the jury, and, finding nothing in any of the assignments of error calling for a reversal of the judgment, it is affirmed. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This is a close case, and the jury might very fairly have found in favor of the defendant, not only on the question of the alleged negligence of his driver, but also on the contributory negligence of the plaintiff. We are of the opinion, however, after an examination of all the testimony, that both of these questions were for the jury, and, finding nothing in any of the assignments of error calling for a reversal of the judgment, it is affirmed. '

Wilson v. Mitton, 101 A. 316, 257 Pa. 86, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 685 (Pa. 1917).

Pincite

101 A. 316 (Wilson v. Mitton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related